From wikipedia |
I'm a sucker for natural disaster movies, even the bad ones.
I do prefer if the science is right, and I grudgingly accept "mostly
right." Tell me an interesting story, with characters I like, too. Some of my favorites are:
Dante's Peak. While some portrayals of the eruption
were wrong, and other bits were understandably changed for the movie (if you
portrayed ash realistically, it'd be a movie with voices coming out of
impenetrable gray stuff, which would be a waste of attractive actors), the
special effects were way cool for the time--and they still hold up.
Supervolcano, BBC. A two-part show about a
Yellowstone supereruption (which you shouldn't spend a second worrying
about--you're far more likely to be eaten by a lion or killed by a cow in your
lifetime). It has all the science right, it bothers to explain a good deal of
it without slowing down the action, and it portrays officials as trying to do
their best/their jobs, which I think is what would happen in a major disaster.
I wish Hollywood usually did half so well with sticking to the facts as the
British filmmakers did here.
The Great Los Angeles Earthquake. Another made-for-TV
movie. Again, they have a lot of the science right. I dislike the one-dimensional
bad guy character (played by "the Paper Chase guy," as we MSTies call
him), but the time frame, what an earthquake is like, what can go wrong, and
the aftermath is much like I'd expect it to be IRL. There'd be even more
looting in an urban area, I suspect, but the confusion and horror, I believed.
And remember, to relatives in the New Madrid Seismic Zone, that's what'd happen
to a prepared city! If another big New Madrid quake happens (as it did in my novel Quake), you guys
are in serious trouble.
Deep Impact. As with other Hollywood films, I force
myself to be happy when they get half of the science right. Here, they probably
didn't even hit 50% (by the time an asteroid was visible with a tiny backyard
scope, everyone on the planet would know about it, and if you explode one, the
mass isn't changed, so you're still going to get superheating of atmosphere, so
li'l Frodo and his wife there would have been flash fried at the end, and
American politicians don't get to decide what celestial objects are
named--international scientists do, via well-established convention--and so
on). But hey, I liked it anyway.
In my opinion, there hasn't been a great weather disaster
movie yet. I wish someone would make one. There are plenty of real-life weather
disasters to choose from.
And I'll add three human-caused disaster movies I like:
The Day After. Yet another TV movie (Made for TV
movies get a bad rap--and probably deservedly so--but with disaster stories, TV
seems to do better than film). Nuclear holocaust. Shocking upon first viewing,
back when. Spoiler: things don't turn out very well.
Testamant. A nuclear disaster film without any
explosions. Follows residents of one small town as radiation sickness takes
them out one by one. Elegiac, touching, and very well acted.
Virus. (復活の日 Fukkatsu no hi) Japanese 1980 film,
partly in English. Multiple disasters lead to an end-of-world scenario.
Unknown/under-appreciated in the US. Find the long version, if you can.
Tell me yours! (even if it is Sharknado.)
I love disaster movies. Dante's Peak is one of my favorites. I've watched it several times. Some other favorites of mine are The Day After Tomorrow, starring Dennis Quaid, Volcano with Tommy Lee Jones, Outbreak with Dustin Hoffman, Twister with Helen Hunt, and The Perfect Storm.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Vicki. I don't think of The Perfect Storm as a weather disaster movie, but it really is. :-)
ReplyDelete